The Future of Human Rights: Restoring America's Leadership
Publication Date: August 2008
Publisher(s): Better World Campaign
Author(s): William F. Schulz
Special Collection: Presidential Advisory
Keywords: International treaties; Human rights; Presidential transition
Coverage: United States
By definition, human rights only gain meaning if they can claim a global imprimatur. They are, after all, universal human rights, not particular to any one country alone.
They "become" rights only because a significant number of countries have recognized them as such. This means that any nation that would understand itself to be a nation that respects and promotes human rights must ipso facto be a nationthat recognizes the authority of the international community when it comes to human rights or else it faces a contradiction.
The United States has been living in contradiction for more than fifty years; the last seven have merely made that contradiction starker. On the one hand, the U.S. has with some good reason prided itself on being a champion of human rights around the world; on the other, it has regularly balked at the authority of the international community upon which those rights are based, especially when it comes to its own practices.