Browse By:

Friday October 19, 2018 Login |Register

A Project of

sponsored by

Renewing The “Internet Tax Freedom Act” Could Have An Especially Adverse Impact On Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio And Texas

Bookmark and Share Report Misuse or Glitches

Publication Date: July 2007

Publisher(s): Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (Washington, D.C.)

Author(s): Michael Mazerov; Will Fischer

Special Collection: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation

Topic: Media, telecommunications, and information (Electronic data processing, transmission, and retrieval)

Keywords: Economic projections; Information technology; State budgets; Internet access

Type: Report

Coverage: Kentucky Michigan Ohio Texas


Although the primary aim of ITFA was to block state and local taxes on consumers of Internet access services, ITFA defines a prohibited tax on Internet access as “a tax on Internet access, regardless of whether such tax is imposed on a provider of Internet access or a buyer of Internet access.”  If ITFA is renewed by either the Wyden-Eshoo bill or the Carper-Alexander bill, this language likely would have a disproportionately adverse impact on the state tax revenues of Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas.