Publication Date: August 2008
Publisher: Better World Campaign
Author(s): William F. Schulz
Research Area: Human rights
Keywords: International treaties; Human rights; Presidential transition
Coverage: United States
By definition, human rights only gain meaning if they can claim a global imprimatur. They are, after all, universal human rights, not particular to any one country alone.
They "become" rights only because a significant number of countries have recognized them as such. This means that any nation that would understand itself to be a nation that respects and promotes human rights must ipso facto be a nationthat recognizes the authority of the international community when it comes to human rights or else it faces a contradiction.
The United States has been living in contradiction for more than fifty years; the last seven have merely made that contradiction starker. On the one hand, the U.S. has with some good reason prided itself on being a champion of human rights around the world; on the other, it has regularly balked at the authority of the international community upon which those rights are based, especially when it comes to its own practices.
Learn how to upload your organization's valuable work into PolicyArchive and share your works with researchers and policymakers around the world.