By using this website you allow us to place cookies on your computer. Please read our Privacy Policy for more details.
Publication Date: December 2001
Publisher: Furman Center for Real Estate
Author(s): Vicki Been
Research Area: Law and ethics
Keywords: land use; Community and Economic Development
Type: Article
Abstract:
My claim in this Article is a narrow one. I take no stand here on whether the “takings†provisions in NAFTA and other investor protection or free trade agreements are, on balance, wealth-maximizing, or desirable from some other normative perspective. Nor do I take a position on whether the existing allocation of authority for land use and environmental regulation among federal, state, and local governments is optimal. Instead, my goal is to highlight the consequences [32 ELR 11002] investor protection provisions could have for that allocation, and thereby seek to ensure that those consequences are taken into account in discussions about the wisdom of including such protections in bilateral and multilateral free trade or investment agreements.