Morocco: From Top-down Reform to Democratic Transition?

Publication Date: October 2006

Publisher: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Author(s): Marina Ottaway; Meredith Riley

Research Area: Politics

Type: Report

Abstract:

Political reform in the Arab world is a top priority in U.S. foreign policy and Morocco is often held up as an example of a country successfully moving toward democracy under the guidance of an enlightened monarch. For over a decade, the Moroccan monarchy has embraced a reformist agenda. As impressive as some of the reforms undoubtedly are, the missing piece--political reform--consistently ensures that there is no threat to the ultimate power of the king. In a new Carnegie Paper, Morocco: From Top-Down Reform to Democratic Transition?, Marina Ottaway and Meredith Riley discuss the necessary steps toward creating a truly democratic political system.

In the case of "reform from the top," the authors argue that the Morocco example shows the limitations of monarchial reform. Despite significant improvements in free speech, women's rights, and economic reform, true democratization cannot exist without formal restrictions on the king's power. Political reform, independent branches of government, and elected institutions are vital components of a democratic society.

Morocco's main Islamist party, the PJD, may hold the key to democracy in the country. Expected to obtain the largest number of votes in the 2007 parliamentary elections, the party will become a major player in the new government. The threat to a democratic transition is not that the party is too radical, but that it may allow itself to be co-opted by the monarch as all other parties have done. In a region where Islamists often threaten political reform, Morocco's main Islamist party could be, paradoxically, its best chance for legitimate democracy.