,,,
By using this website you allow us to place cookies on your computer. Please read our Privacy Policy for more details.
Publication Date: January 2003
Publisher: RAND Corporation
Author(s): Bruce Held; David M. Oaks; William M. Hix; Edward G. Keating
Research Area: Military and defense
Type: Brief
Abstract:
The U.S. Army retains organic facilities to provide a significant part of its ordnance materiel and ammunition. What should the future hold for these 16 facilities--five of them government-owned, government-operated, the rest government-owned contractor-operated? This briefing looked at four options (in addition to maintaining the status quo): privatization, creating a Federal Government Corporation, consolidation, and recapitalization. After looking at the pros and cons of each, the authors concluded that all four were feasible and that a mixed strategy probably offered the best possibility for achieving the Army’s aims.