Browse By:


Wednesday July 23, 2014 Login |Register


A Project of

sponsored by

College and University Commitments to Student Access and Success: An Overview of Institutional Postsecondary Opportunity Programs

Bookmark and Share Report Misuse or Glitches

Publication Date: July 2010

Publisher(s): Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education (WISCAPE), University of Wisconsin-Madison

Author(s): Elizabeth Stransky Vaade

Series:

Special Collection:

Topic: Education (Colleges and universities)
Education (Education policy and planning)

Keywords: College access, persistence, and success; Postsecondary opportunity programs

Type: Report

Coverage: United States

Abstract:

The federal and state governments are placing greater emphasis on postsecondary attainment while concerns about rising college costs for students and families surge. Both groups are calling on institutions to do more to help improve student access and achievement rates. Further, recent research and policy have put pressure on institutions to admit more students (particularly those from underrepresented groups), address rising tuition, and help students persist to completion. The recession has also led institutions to think of new or enhanced means of contributing to local economic development.

To meet these latest demands and roles, postsecondary institutions have begun designing and implementing postsecondary opportunity programs (POPs). These programs and partnerships aim to increase educational attainment by confronting the barriers to postsecondary access, persistence, and success; some specifically identify educational attainment as a means to economic and community development.

POPs are administered at the state, county, municipal, district, institutional, or private level. This brief focuses on institutional POPs, which are situated at the center of postsecondary learning and therefore uniquely positioned to address the nation’s educational attainment challenges. It explores the goals, eligibility requirements, benefits, and revenue sources of 22 institutional POPs nationwide and offers four recommendations for institutional POPs administrators to consider as they move forward.